Climate change is a hot topic for
discussion today (pun is entirely incidental!), and we can expect to be getting
a large number of works on this subject. Funnily enough, there doesn’t seem to
be one single heading under which all these could be collated. Let’s have a
look.
On the face of it, we would expect the
topic “Climate change” to be filed under
the broad head of Climate, rather than Change. The first number that occurs to
us is probably Climate, which occurs under the Earth sciences (550), which
takes us successively to 551 and finally 551.6 Climatology and weather. However,
there is no entry under this number (sub-section) for climate change as we understand
it. If we wished to put the item in this class specifically, we may have to
make do with the closest approximation: perhaps 551.609 Historical, geographic
and persons treatment, on the premise that climate change is mainly about how
it’s been undergoing change over eras and centuries (especially since the
Industrial evolution), and how it’s going to change in the coming decades
unless world leaders take responsible action. Another number that may be
suggested is 551.63 Weather forecasting and forecasts, but I think this would
narrow down the scope too much (from general climate to weather), and would be
useful more for specific discussions of the increased variability of the
climate as expressed in specific phenomena like monsoons, heat waves etc. in
specific regions (the effects of
climate change).
However, to me the number 551.609 is not
quite satisfactory as it does not reflect the special focus of the topic, which
is the sudden and unprecedented acceleration in all sorts of effects in the
global atmosphere that is leading to the unpleasant changes in the large scale
climate phenomena, with all the consequences for humanity. A mere retelling of
the history of climate does not appear to reflect this sense of urgency and
impending doom. This number, therefore,
would be at best kept for older accounts that describe the changes over time,
without much emphasis on the international and national policy and other
efforts that are urgently called for to mitigate, or adapt to, the effects of
climate change.
Another possibility occurs in the number
for the physical science of climate phenomena, which would be under 551.5
Meteorology. Here is where the specific phenomena are discussed: rainfall and
snow, storms and hurricanes, monsoons and clouds. These numbers may be suitable
for works that focus clearly on the science of climate. Where would the notion
of change fit in? Since we are
principally concerned with global warming as a prelude or cause of change in global
climate patterns, we would probably be looking at 551.52 Thermodynamics etc.,
specifically 551.525 Temperatures: atmospheric warming, for instance.
So far for the physical science of climate
change. When we think of the topic in relation to the contributing factors and world
policy, however, we will probably look at the economics or the ecology of the
environment and natural resources, which would tend to take us to 333.7 – 333.9
Natural resources and energy, or specifically to 333.7 Land, recreational and
wilderness areas, energy (renamed in dc22; it was previously more general, Land
and natural resources in dc20). This is where works “interdisciplinary works on
the environment” are to be filed, and this is where there seems to be a
plausible entry point for books on climate change. This number may therefore be
suitable for works which treat of climate change as an environmental and social
issue, rather than as a scientific topic for research, methodology and
technological control. The number 333.72 Conservation and protection is also
available, as it includes a “class here” instruction for works on
“environmentalism, comprehensive works on conservation and protection of natural
resources” (of which atmosphere is presumably an important one). If you really wanted to stretch it, perhaps
you could even consider 333.92 Air, but then it appears this number is meant to
consider these as resources for use (in the line up of all natural resources
like land, water, minerals, etc.) rather than as an environmental sink.
We were also considering climate change as
a part of ecology, which would take us to 577 Ecology (in dc22); here, the only
remotely connected entry seems to be under 577.2 Specific factors affecting
ecology. We see 577.27 Effects of humans on ecology, then 577.276 Air
pollution, “Including pollution by gases contributing to greenhouse effect
(global warming), to ozone layer depletion” and a note “Class here pollution by
combustion gases”, which presumably refers to gaseous oxides of carbon,
nitrogen sulphur, etc.
A broader hint is provided under the entry
333.7, “See Manual at 363 vs. 302-307, 333.7, 570-590, 600”, and under 333.72,
Environmentalism, “See Manual at 333.72 vs. 304.28, 320.58, 363.7”. These other
suggested numbers provide yet more possible options. Thus, 363.7 Environmental problems provides a
completely new alternative location under the broad rubric of Social problems
and services, specifically under 363.73 Pollution, 363.73874 Greenhouse gases.
However, the note under this number very helpfully refers us to other numbers
for a “specific aspect of greenhouse effect (global warming) not provided for here”,
“e.g. changes in earth’s temperature 551.5253, effect on ecology 577.276”.
The number 304.28 is a very interesting
topic, under 304.2 Human ecology; 304.28 Environmental abuse, “(i)ncluding
greenhouse effect”. The Note in the Introduction says “Use 333.72 for works on
environmentalism discussing the broader concept of preventing and protecting
the supply as well as the quality of natural resources and for works about the
environmental movement that focus on the concerns it shares with the long
established conservation movement”; and use 304.28 for works “that emphasize
the effects upon society of overuse, misuse, or pollution of the environment”.
“Use 320.58 for works that emphasize the potential ideologies of
environmentalism. Use 363.7 for works on preserving and restoring the quality
of the social living space… If in doubt, prefer in the following order: 333.72,
304.28, 363.7”.
There is a general instruction in the
Introduction (para 5.4 in DDC22, Vol.1), which is that “a work is classed in
the discipline for which it is intended, rather than the discipline from which
the work is derived”. Another principle, which I feel is closely related, is
given in para 5.7, termed the rule of
application: “Class a work dealing
with interrelated subjects with the subject that is being acted upon”. This
rule is to take precedence over any other rule. Accordingly, a work that is
concerned with the effects of climate
change would be classed with the resource affected by climate change, that is
the ecological subjects provided under 577 or the natural resources under 337.
On the other hand, if climate change itself is being discussed as a consequence
of other actions, then I feel the work would go (as per the above rules) under
a climate heading, i.e. 551.
We can see that even a sharply defined and
dynamic topic like Climate Change is amenable to multiple options under the DDC,
even though one of the strengths of this scheme is precisely that it provides
concise, specific, headings for interdisciplinary subjects so that we would not
have to construct our own composite numbers (an option that is liberally
provided in the Universal Decimal system, through the co-ordinating colon : connector
for any two or more individual numbers). Probably the people at Dewey have not
got around to this as far as Climate Change is concerned (there is not even a
proper entry in the index, which provides a different aspect of “climatic
change”): perhaps we will see it very soon in DDC 23 or 24! In anticipation of
such a development, we should be making an educated guess now about the most
likely location or section under which such a specific heading will be
provided. To me, the natural location for interdisciplinary works on Climate
Change, with a heavy tilt to policy and instruments, mitigation and adaptation,
would be under 333.7, atmosphere as one among the natural resources, or perhaps
right under 333.92 Air.
As before, more than getting every nuance
right, it is a probably more helpful to get all our books and resources on this
subject grouped together in one location. On looking at my collection, I find
that the majority of works have ended up (rather tamely!) under the catch-all
number 333.7. This is understandable, because most of them treat the subject in
the context of a whole lot of other environmental and policy issues, like
development strategies, international competition, optimal consumption and life
styles, income distribution, technologies, trade and barriers, population
control, energy, water, forests, and so on. However, some books that deal with
only the physics or technology of the subject have gone under 551.525, while a
few which are about mitigation and adaptation have gone under 363.7. Given an ultimatum
to choose, I think it would be my instinct to put most of them under the
inter-disciplinary number 333.7, while
works that focused more on measures to retrieve the atmosphere and reduce its carbon
load would perhaps go under 333.72. I would probably avoid 363.7, because this
would scatter the works over too wide a swath of numbers, and 363 would
probably be naturally expected to hold works on various aspects of social
welfare, and not works on environmental conservation (in comparison to 333.7).
Incidentally, 333.7 itself has been
modified in DDC 22, where it is labelled “Land, recreational and wilderness
areas, energy”. In DDC 20, on the other hand, it had the definition “Natural
resources and energy”, which has been retained in DDC 22 for the “centred
entry” 333.7-333.9. Despite all this, 333.7 continues to be the recommended
number for “interdisciplinary works on the environment” in both versions, while
DDC 22 indicates 333.72 specifically for “environmentalism, comprehensive works
on conservation and protection of natural resources”.
I'm so surprised there aren't comments here! Excellent post that covers so much ... I've struggled with "climate change" books being in the 300's (even though I understand why) and I respect your decision to use those call numbers. However, I've long felt that for school libraries, the 500's seem more appropriate for various reasons, and I truly appreciate your breakdown of the pros and cons of various call numbers in that range. I haven't decided yet, but you've provided excellent food for thought - thank you!
ReplyDeleteThe topic about the "effects of climate change" on something else is very complicated. For instance, our instructor gave us the following subject statement: "The effects of climate change on water conservation." This is not a simple subject statement a classifier can deal with easily. The problem arises when we have to establish whether climate change effects or water conservation should be used as the base number.
ReplyDeleteExcellent blog post - thank you.
ReplyDeleteThe Star Casino | GoyangFC
ReplyDeleteThe Star Casino 바퀴벌레 포커 is a premier 사이트제작 gambling hub in 10 벳 Greater San Francisco. Come with a trip, dining and 골인 벳 entertainment at The 벳 365 주소 Star Casino, Hours of operation: Main HoursMonday: Closed
Thank you. I'm an elementary school librarian trying to make things easy for kids. This post was very helpful. I'm using a 'Dewey no decimals' system. 333 fits my needs.
ReplyDelete